Cranium vs Apiiro: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?
Cranium and Apiiro are both AI-SPM / Runtime Protection vendors. Cranium covers 1 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and Apiiro covers 1, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, Cranium and Apiiro cover the same number of OWASP LLM Top 10 risks (1 each); the difference is in which ones. The full row-by-row diff is below.
Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.
Spec comparison
| Attribute | Cranium | Apiiro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI-SPM / Runtime Protection | AI-SPM / Runtime Protection |
| Deployment | SaaS (app.cranium.ai) | SaaS control plane (integrates with code repos/CI) |
| Best for | Enterprises needing to discover and inventory AI models/data/vendors (AI Bill of Materials), map exposure, and stress-test models across a large AI estate | Security teams securing the SDLC, AI-generated code and software supply chain across large codebases |
| Founded | 2023 | 2019 |
| Funding | $32M | $135M |
| Status | Active | Active |
OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: Cranium vs Apiiro
This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.
| OWASP LLM Risk | Cranium | Apiiro |
|---|---|---|
| LLM01 Prompt Injection | Partial | Partial |
| LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure | Partial | Partial |
| LLM03 Supply Chain | Covered | Covered |
| LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning | Partial | Partial |
| LLM05 Improper Output Handling | Not covered | Partial |
| LLM06 Excessive Agency | Partial | Partial |
| LLM07 System Prompt Leakage | Not covered | Not covered |
| LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | Not covered | Not covered |
| LLM09 Misinformation | Not covered | Not covered |
| LLM10 Unbounded Consumption | Not covered | Not covered |
Where they differ
Apiiro covers LLM05 Improper Output Handling where Cranium doesn't.
On the rest, they overlap. Past those gaps the decision is depth per risk, deployment, and price, not breadth.
Which should you choose?
On raw counts it's a tie at 1 covered risks each — the difference is which risks. Cranium is built for enterprises needing to discover and inventory AI models/data/vendors (AI Bill of Materials), map exposure, and stress-test models across a large AI estate, while Apiiro suits security teams securing the SDLC, AI-generated code and software supply chain across large codebases. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: Cranium and Apiiro.
Frequently asked questions
Does Cranium or Apiiro cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?
Neither — both cover 1 of the ten risks by our scoring, though not the same ones. The diff table above shows where they split.
Are Cranium and Apiiro independent?
Cranium is independent; Apiiro is independent, as of 2026-07-13.