llmthreat
For vendors 21 vendors · 10 tools Matrix Vendors

Enkrypt AI vs Lakera: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?

Enkrypt AI and Lakera are both Guardrails / LLM Firewall vendors. Enkrypt AI covers 4 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and Lakera covers 8, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, Lakera covers more of the OWASP LLM Top 10 (8 vs 4). The full row-by-row diff is below.

Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.

Spec comparison

AttributeEnkrypt AILakera
CategoryGuardrails / LLM FirewallGuardrails / LLM Firewall
DeploymentSaaS/API guardrails and gateway; enterprise deploymentsSaaS API + self-hosted/on-prem guardrail
Best forTeams wanting combined red teaming plus runtime guardrails, hallucination detection and compliance evidence for LLM/agent appsReal-time prompt-injection and content guardrails for GenAI/agentic apps, plus pre-deployment red teaming
Founded20222021
Funding$2.35M~$30M total (incl. $20M Series A)
StatusActiveAcquired · Check Point Software

OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: Enkrypt AI vs Lakera

This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.

OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) coverage diff — as of 2026-07-13
OWASP LLM RiskEnkrypt AILakera
LLM01 Prompt Injection Covered Covered
LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure Covered Covered
LLM03 Supply Chain Partial Partial
LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning Partial Covered
LLM05 Improper Output Handling Partial Covered
LLM06 Excessive Agency Partial Partial
LLM07 System Prompt Leakage Covered Covered
LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses Partial Covered
LLM09 Misinformation Covered Covered
LLM10 Unbounded Consumption Partial Covered

Where they differ

On breadth they're even: both address the same OWASP risks by our scoring. That pushes the decision onto depth per risk, deployment model, and price. Read both profiles below.

Which should you choose?

Lakera edges it on breadth, 8 covered risks to 4. Enkrypt AI is built for teams wanting combined red teaming plus runtime guardrails, hallucination detection and compliance evidence for LLM/agent apps, while Lakera suits real-time prompt-injection and content guardrails for GenAI/agentic apps, plus pre-deployment red teaming. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: Enkrypt AI and Lakera.

Frequently asked questions

Does Enkrypt AI or Lakera cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?

Lakera does, 8 risks to 4 by our scoring. The diff table above shows exactly where they part ways.

Are Enkrypt AI and Lakera independent?

Enkrypt AI is independent; Lakera was acquired by Check Point Software, as of 2026-07-13.

Last verified . Sources: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/enkrypt-ai-raises-2-35m-025400564.html, https://www.checkpoint.com/press-releases/check-point-acquires-lakera-to-deliver-end-to-end-ai-security-for-enterprises/, OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025). Funding and repo figures are third-party and go stale. Re-verify before you rely on them.
Informational, not professional security advice — verify both vendors' claims against OWASP, MITRE, and the vendors directly before a decision. OWASP, MITRE, and the listed vendors and maintainers do not endorse llmthreat.com.