Enkrypt AI vs Lasso Security: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?
Enkrypt AI and Lasso Security are both Guardrails / LLM Firewall vendors. Enkrypt AI covers 4 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and Lasso Security covers 3, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, Enkrypt AI covers more of the OWASP LLM Top 10 (4 vs 3). The full row-by-row diff is below.
Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.
Spec comparison
| Attribute | Enkrypt AI | Lasso Security |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Guardrails / LLM Firewall | Guardrails / LLM Firewall |
| Deployment | SaaS/API guardrails and gateway; enterprise deployments | SaaS with runtime proxy/gateway; MCP security for agents |
| Best for | Teams wanting combined red teaming plus runtime guardrails, hallucination detection and compliance evidence for LLM/agent apps | Enterprises wanting full-lifecycle GenAI security from shadow-AI discovery through runtime protection and red teaming |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Funding | $2.35M | Undisclosed |
| Status | Active | Active |
OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: Enkrypt AI vs Lasso Security
This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.
| OWASP LLM Risk | Enkrypt AI | Lasso Security |
|---|---|---|
| LLM01 Prompt Injection | Covered | Covered |
| LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure | Covered | Covered |
| LLM03 Supply Chain | Partial | Partial |
| LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning | Partial | Partial |
| LLM05 Improper Output Handling | Partial | Partial |
| LLM06 Excessive Agency | Partial | Covered |
| LLM07 System Prompt Leakage | Covered | Unverified |
| LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | Partial | Unverified |
| LLM09 Misinformation | Covered | Unverified |
| LLM10 Unbounded Consumption | Partial | Unverified |
Where they differ
Enkrypt AI addresses LLM07 System Prompt Leakage, LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses, LLM09 Misinformation, LLM10 Unbounded Consumption — risks where Lasso Security scores Not covered or Unverified.
On the rest, they overlap. Past those gaps the decision is depth per risk, deployment, and price, not breadth.
Which should you choose?
Enkrypt AI edges it on breadth, 4 covered risks to 3. Enkrypt AI is built for teams wanting combined red teaming plus runtime guardrails, hallucination detection and compliance evidence for LLM/agent apps, while Lasso Security suits enterprises wanting full-lifecycle GenAI security from shadow-AI discovery through runtime protection and red teaming. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: Enkrypt AI and Lasso Security.
Frequently asked questions
Does Enkrypt AI or Lasso Security cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?
Enkrypt AI does, 4 risks to 3 by our scoring. The diff table above shows exactly where they part ways.
Are Enkrypt AI and Lasso Security independent?
Enkrypt AI is independent; Lasso Security is independent, as of 2026-07-13.