Enkrypt AI vs WitnessAI: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?
Enkrypt AI and WitnessAI are both Guardrails / LLM Firewall vendors. Enkrypt AI covers 4 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and WitnessAI covers 3, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, Enkrypt AI covers more of the OWASP LLM Top 10 (4 vs 3). The full row-by-row diff is below.
Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.
Spec comparison
| Attribute | Enkrypt AI | WitnessAI |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Guardrails / LLM Firewall | Guardrails / LLM Firewall |
| Deployment | SaaS/API guardrails and gateway; enterprise deployments | Single-tenant environment with data sovereignty (proxy/gateway model) |
| Best for | Teams wanting combined red teaming plus runtime guardrails, hallucination detection and compliance evidence for LLM/agent apps | Enterprises needing an inline AI firewall to discover shadow AI/MCP servers, enforce policy, redact sensitive data, and block prompt injection/jailbreaks across employee and agent usage |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Funding | $2.35M | Over $85M |
| Status | Active | Active |
OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: Enkrypt AI vs WitnessAI
This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.
| OWASP LLM Risk | Enkrypt AI | WitnessAI |
|---|---|---|
| LLM01 Prompt Injection | Covered | Covered |
| LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure | Covered | Covered |
| LLM03 Supply Chain | Partial | Partial |
| LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning | Partial | Not covered |
| LLM05 Improper Output Handling | Partial | Partial |
| LLM06 Excessive Agency | Partial | Covered |
| LLM07 System Prompt Leakage | Covered | Not covered |
| LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | Partial | Not covered |
| LLM09 Misinformation | Covered | Partial |
| LLM10 Unbounded Consumption | Partial | Not covered |
Where they differ
Enkrypt AI addresses LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning, LLM07 System Prompt Leakage, LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses, LLM10 Unbounded Consumption — risks where WitnessAI scores Not covered or Unverified.
On the rest, they overlap. Past those gaps the decision is depth per risk, deployment, and price, not breadth.
Which should you choose?
Enkrypt AI edges it on breadth, 4 covered risks to 3. Enkrypt AI is built for teams wanting combined red teaming plus runtime guardrails, hallucination detection and compliance evidence for LLM/agent apps, while WitnessAI suits enterprises needing an inline AI firewall to discover shadow AI/MCP servers, enforce policy, redact sensitive data, and block prompt injection/jailbreaks across employee and agent usage. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: Enkrypt AI and WitnessAI.
Frequently asked questions
Does Enkrypt AI or WitnessAI cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?
Enkrypt AI does, 4 risks to 3 by our scoring. The diff table above shows exactly where they part ways.
Are Enkrypt AI and WitnessAI independent?
Enkrypt AI is independent; WitnessAI is independent, as of 2026-07-13.