Giskard vs Robust Intelligence: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?
Giskard and Robust Intelligence are both AI Red Teaming vendors. Giskard covers 4 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and Robust Intelligence covers 3, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, Giskard covers more of the OWASP LLM Top 10 (4 vs 3). The full row-by-row diff is below.
Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.
Spec comparison
| Attribute | Giskard | Robust Intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Red Teaming | AI Red Teaming |
| Deployment | SaaS (Giskard Hub, EU/US data residency), self-hosted/on-premise, open-source library | SaaS + self-hosted; inline AI firewall proxy + validation pipeline |
| Best for | ML/AI teams needing continuous, automated red teaming and hallucination/robustness testing before and after deployment, with open-source and sovereign options | Automated pre-deployment red teaming plus runtime guardrails, especially for Cisco-aligned enterprise stacks |
| Founded | 2021 | 2019 |
| Funding | €7.5M + $5M round (2025) | ~$44M total (seed + Series A + $30M Series B) |
| Status | Active | Acquired · Cisco |
OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: Giskard vs Robust Intelligence
This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.
| OWASP LLM Risk | Giskard | Robust Intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| LLM01 Prompt Injection | Covered | Covered |
| LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure | Covered | Covered |
| LLM03 Supply Chain | Not covered | Partial |
| LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning | Not covered | Covered |
| LLM05 Improper Output Handling | Partial | Partial |
| LLM06 Excessive Agency | Partial | Partial |
| LLM07 System Prompt Leakage | Partial | Partial |
| LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | Partial | Unverified |
| LLM09 Misinformation | Covered | Partial |
| LLM10 Unbounded Consumption | Covered | Unverified |
Where they differ
Giskard addresses LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses, LLM10 Unbounded Consumption — risks where Robust Intelligence scores Not covered or Unverified.
Robust Intelligence covers LLM03 Supply Chain, LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning where Giskard doesn't.
On the rest, they overlap. Past those gaps the decision is depth per risk, deployment, and price, not breadth.
Which should you choose?
Giskard edges it on breadth, 4 covered risks to 3. Giskard is built for mL/AI teams needing continuous, automated red teaming and hallucination/robustness testing before and after deployment, with open-source and sovereign options, while Robust Intelligence suits automated pre-deployment red teaming plus runtime guardrails, especially for Cisco-aligned enterprise stacks. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: Giskard and Robust Intelligence.
Frequently asked questions
Does Giskard or Robust Intelligence cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?
Giskard does, 4 risks to 3 by our scoring. The diff table above shows exactly where they part ways.
Are Giskard and Robust Intelligence independent?
Giskard is independent; Robust Intelligence was acquired by Cisco, as of 2026-07-13.