Giskard vs TrojAI: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?
Giskard and TrojAI are both AI Red Teaming vendors. Giskard covers 4 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and TrojAI covers 5, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, TrojAI covers more of the OWASP LLM Top 10 (5 vs 4). The full row-by-row diff is below.
Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.
Spec comparison
| Attribute | Giskard | TrojAI |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Red Teaming | AI Red Teaming |
| Deployment | SaaS (Giskard Hub, EU/US data residency), self-hosted/on-premise, open-source library | SaaS and self-hosted; runtime firewall (Defend), incl. MCP |
| Best for | ML/AI teams needing continuous, automated red teaming and hallucination/robustness testing before and after deployment, with open-source and sovereign options | Enterprises wanting model/agent red teaming with OWASP mapping plus runtime firewall for LLM and MCP/agentic workflows |
| Founded | 2021 | Undisclosed |
| Funding | €7.5M + $5M round (2025) | Undisclosed |
| Status | Active | Acquired · A10 Networks |
OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: Giskard vs TrojAI
This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.
| OWASP LLM Risk | Giskard | TrojAI |
|---|---|---|
| LLM01 Prompt Injection | Covered | Covered |
| LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure | Covered | Covered |
| LLM03 Supply Chain | Not covered | Partial |
| LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning | Not covered | Partial |
| LLM05 Improper Output Handling | Partial | Partial |
| LLM06 Excessive Agency | Partial | Covered |
| LLM07 System Prompt Leakage | Partial | Covered |
| LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | Partial | Covered |
| LLM09 Misinformation | Covered | Partial |
| LLM10 Unbounded Consumption | Covered | Unverified |
Where they differ
Giskard addresses LLM10 Unbounded Consumption — risks where TrojAI scores Not covered or Unverified.
TrojAI covers LLM03 Supply Chain, LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning where Giskard doesn't.
On the rest, they overlap. Past those gaps the decision is depth per risk, deployment, and price, not breadth.
Which should you choose?
TrojAI edges it on breadth, 5 covered risks to 4. Giskard is built for mL/AI teams needing continuous, automated red teaming and hallucination/robustness testing before and after deployment, with open-source and sovereign options, while TrojAI suits enterprises wanting model/agent red teaming with OWASP mapping plus runtime firewall for LLM and MCP/agentic workflows. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: Giskard and TrojAI.
Frequently asked questions
Does Giskard or TrojAI cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?
TrojAI does, 5 risks to 4 by our scoring. The diff table above shows exactly where they part ways.
Are Giskard and TrojAI independent?
Giskard is independent; TrojAI was acquired by A10 Networks, as of 2026-07-13.