Lakera vs Mindgard: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?
Lakera is Guardrails / LLM Firewall; Mindgard sits in AI Red Teaming. Lakera covers 8 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and Mindgard covers 4, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, Lakera covers more of the OWASP LLM Top 10 (8 vs 4). The full row-by-row diff is below.
Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.
Spec comparison
| Attribute | Lakera | Mindgard |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Guardrails / LLM Firewall | AI Red Teaming |
| Deployment | SaaS API + self-hosted/on-prem guardrail | SaaS cloud platform with API and CI/CD integration; Burp Suite integration |
| Best for | Real-time prompt-injection and content guardrails for GenAI/agentic apps, plus pre-deployment red teaming | Security teams wanting continuous automated red teaming and attack-surface mapping for LLMs, image models and agents |
| Founded | 2021 | 2022 |
| Funding | ~$30M total (incl. $20M Series A) | $11.6M+ |
| Status | Acquired · Check Point Software | Active |
OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: Lakera vs Mindgard
This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.
| OWASP LLM Risk | Lakera | Mindgard |
|---|---|---|
| LLM01 Prompt Injection | Covered | Covered |
| LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure | Covered | Partial |
| LLM03 Supply Chain | Partial | Partial |
| LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning | Covered | Covered |
| LLM05 Improper Output Handling | Covered | Unverified |
| LLM06 Excessive Agency | Partial | Partial |
| LLM07 System Prompt Leakage | Covered | Covered |
| LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | Covered | Unverified |
| LLM09 Misinformation | Covered | Covered |
| LLM10 Unbounded Consumption | Covered | Partial |
Where they differ
Lakera addresses LLM05 Improper Output Handling, LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses — risks where Mindgard scores Not covered or Unverified.
On the rest, they overlap. Past those gaps the decision is depth per risk, deployment, and price, not breadth.
Which should you choose?
Lakera edges it on breadth, 8 covered risks to 4. Lakera is built for real-time prompt-injection and content guardrails for GenAI/agentic apps, plus pre-deployment red teaming, while Mindgard suits security teams wanting continuous automated red teaming and attack-surface mapping for LLMs, image models and agents. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: Lakera and Mindgard.
Frequently asked questions
Does Lakera or Mindgard cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?
Lakera does, 8 risks to 4 by our scoring. The diff table above shows exactly where they part ways.
Are Lakera and Mindgard independent?
Lakera was acquired by Check Point Software; Mindgard is independent, as of 2026-07-13.