Lakera vs WitnessAI: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?
Lakera and WitnessAI are both Guardrails / LLM Firewall vendors. Lakera covers 8 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and WitnessAI covers 3, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, Lakera covers more of the OWASP LLM Top 10 (8 vs 3). The full row-by-row diff is below.
Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.
Spec comparison
| Attribute | Lakera | WitnessAI |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Guardrails / LLM Firewall | Guardrails / LLM Firewall |
| Deployment | SaaS API + self-hosted/on-prem guardrail | Single-tenant environment with data sovereignty (proxy/gateway model) |
| Best for | Real-time prompt-injection and content guardrails for GenAI/agentic apps, plus pre-deployment red teaming | Enterprises needing an inline AI firewall to discover shadow AI/MCP servers, enforce policy, redact sensitive data, and block prompt injection/jailbreaks across employee and agent usage |
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
| Funding | ~$30M total (incl. $20M Series A) | Over $85M |
| Status | Acquired · Check Point Software | Active |
OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: Lakera vs WitnessAI
This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.
| OWASP LLM Risk | Lakera | WitnessAI |
|---|---|---|
| LLM01 Prompt Injection | Covered | Covered |
| LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure | Covered | Covered |
| LLM03 Supply Chain | Partial | Partial |
| LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning | Covered | Not covered |
| LLM05 Improper Output Handling | Covered | Partial |
| LLM06 Excessive Agency | Partial | Covered |
| LLM07 System Prompt Leakage | Covered | Not covered |
| LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | Covered | Not covered |
| LLM09 Misinformation | Covered | Partial |
| LLM10 Unbounded Consumption | Covered | Not covered |
Where they differ
Lakera addresses LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning, LLM07 System Prompt Leakage, LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses, LLM10 Unbounded Consumption — risks where WitnessAI scores Not covered or Unverified.
On the rest, they overlap. Past those gaps the decision is depth per risk, deployment, and price, not breadth.
Which should you choose?
Lakera edges it on breadth, 8 covered risks to 3. Lakera is built for real-time prompt-injection and content guardrails for GenAI/agentic apps, plus pre-deployment red teaming, while WitnessAI suits enterprises needing an inline AI firewall to discover shadow AI/MCP servers, enforce policy, redact sensitive data, and block prompt injection/jailbreaks across employee and agent usage. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: Lakera and WitnessAI.
Frequently asked questions
Does Lakera or WitnessAI cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?
Lakera does, 8 risks to 3 by our scoring. The diff table above shows exactly where they part ways.
Are Lakera and WitnessAI independent?
Lakera was acquired by Check Point Software; WitnessAI is independent, as of 2026-07-13.