Lasso Security vs Pangea: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?
Lasso Security and Pangea are both Guardrails / LLM Firewall vendors. Lasso Security covers 3 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and Pangea covers 3, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, Lasso Security and Pangea cover the same number of OWASP LLM Top 10 risks (3 each); the difference is in which ones. The full row-by-row diff is below.
Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.
Spec comparison
| Attribute | Lasso Security | Pangea |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Guardrails / LLM Firewall | Guardrails / LLM Firewall |
| Deployment | SaaS with runtime proxy/gateway; MCP security for agents | SaaS API guardrails (cloud + self-hosted deployment options) |
| Best for | Enterprises wanting full-lifecycle GenAI security from shadow-AI discovery through runtime protection and red teaming | Developers embedding API-based prompt-injection and data-leakage guardrails into GenAI apps |
| Founded | 2023 | 2021 |
| Funding | Undisclosed | ~$51-52M total (Series A $25M + Series B $26M) |
| Status | Active | Acquired · CrowdStrike |
OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: Lasso Security vs Pangea
This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.
| OWASP LLM Risk | Lasso Security | Pangea |
|---|---|---|
| LLM01 Prompt Injection | Covered | Covered |
| LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure | Covered | Covered |
| LLM03 Supply Chain | Partial | Unverified |
| LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning | Partial | Unverified |
| LLM05 Improper Output Handling | Partial | Partial |
| LLM06 Excessive Agency | Covered | Partial |
| LLM07 System Prompt Leakage | Unverified | Partial |
| LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | Unverified | Partial |
| LLM09 Misinformation | Unverified | Covered |
| LLM10 Unbounded Consumption | Unverified | Partial |
Where they differ
Lasso Security addresses LLM03 Supply Chain, LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning — risks where Pangea scores Not covered or Unverified.
Pangea covers LLM07 System Prompt Leakage, LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses, LLM09 Misinformation, LLM10 Unbounded Consumption where Lasso Security doesn't.
On the rest, they overlap. Past those gaps the decision is depth per risk, deployment, and price, not breadth.
Which should you choose?
On raw counts it's a tie at 3 covered risks each — the difference is which risks. Lasso Security is built for enterprises wanting full-lifecycle GenAI security from shadow-AI discovery through runtime protection and red teaming, while Pangea suits developers embedding API-based prompt-injection and data-leakage guardrails into GenAI apps. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: Lasso Security and Pangea.
Frequently asked questions
Does Lasso Security or Pangea cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?
Neither — both cover 3 of the ten risks by our scoring, though not the same ones. The diff table above shows where they split.
Are Lasso Security and Pangea independent?
Lasso Security is independent; Pangea was acquired by CrowdStrike, as of 2026-07-13.