llmthreat
For vendors 21 vendors · 10 tools Matrix Vendors

Protect AI vs Apiiro: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?

Protect AI and Apiiro are both AI-SPM / Runtime Protection vendors. Protect AI covers 2 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and Apiiro covers 1, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, Protect AI covers more of the OWASP LLM Top 10 (2 vs 1). The full row-by-row diff is below.

Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.

Spec comparison

AttributeProtect AIApiiro
CategoryAI-SPM / Runtime ProtectionAI-SPM / Runtime Protection
DeploymentSaaS + self-hosted; API/gateway and CI scanningSaaS control plane (integrates with code repos/CI)
Best forSecuring the ML model supply chain, scanning third-party/Hugging Face models, and MLSecOps in the build pipelineSecurity teams securing the SDLC, AI-generated code and software supply chain across large codebases
Founded20222019
Funding~$108.5M (seed + Series A + $60M Series B); some trackers list up to $129M$135M
StatusAcquired · Palo Alto NetworksActive

OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: Protect AI vs Apiiro

This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.

OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) coverage diff — as of 2026-07-13
OWASP LLM RiskProtect AIApiiro
LLM01 Prompt Injection Partial Partial
LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure Partial Partial
LLM03 Supply Chain Covered Covered
LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning Covered Partial
LLM05 Improper Output Handling Partial Partial
LLM06 Excessive Agency Unverified Partial
LLM07 System Prompt Leakage Partial Not covered
LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses Unverified Not covered
LLM09 Misinformation Unverified Not covered
LLM10 Unbounded Consumption Unverified Not covered

Where they differ

Protect AI addresses LLM07 System Prompt Leakage — risks where Apiiro scores Not covered or Unverified.

Apiiro covers LLM06 Excessive Agency where Protect AI doesn't.

On the rest, they overlap. Past those gaps the decision is depth per risk, deployment, and price, not breadth.

Which should you choose?

Protect AI edges it on breadth, 2 covered risks to 1. Protect AI is built for securing the ML model supply chain, scanning third-party/Hugging Face models, and MLSecOps in the build pipeline, while Apiiro suits security teams securing the SDLC, AI-generated code and software supply chain across large codebases. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: Protect AI and Apiiro.

Frequently asked questions

Does Protect AI or Apiiro cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?

Protect AI does, 2 risks to 1 by our scoring. The diff table above shows exactly where they part ways.

Are Protect AI and Apiiro independent?

Protect AI was acquired by Palo Alto Networks; Apiiro is independent, as of 2026-07-13.

Last verified . Sources: https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/company/press/2025/palo-alto-networks-announces-intent-to-acquire-protect-ai--a-game-changing-security-for-ai-company, https://apiiro.com/, OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025). Funding and repo figures are third-party and go stale. Re-verify before you rely on them.
Informational, not professional security advice — verify both vendors' claims against OWASP, MITRE, and the vendors directly before a decision. OWASP, MITRE, and the listed vendors and maintainers do not endorse llmthreat.com.