Protect AI vs Cranium: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?
Protect AI and Cranium are both AI-SPM / Runtime Protection vendors. Protect AI covers 2 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and Cranium covers 1, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, Protect AI covers more of the OWASP LLM Top 10 (2 vs 1). The full row-by-row diff is below.
Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.
Spec comparison
| Attribute | Protect AI | Cranium |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI-SPM / Runtime Protection | AI-SPM / Runtime Protection |
| Deployment | SaaS + self-hosted; API/gateway and CI scanning | SaaS (app.cranium.ai) |
| Best for | Securing the ML model supply chain, scanning third-party/Hugging Face models, and MLSecOps in the build pipeline | Enterprises needing to discover and inventory AI models/data/vendors (AI Bill of Materials), map exposure, and stress-test models across a large AI estate |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Funding | ~$108.5M (seed + Series A + $60M Series B); some trackers list up to $129M | $32M |
| Status | Acquired · Palo Alto Networks | Active |
OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: Protect AI vs Cranium
This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.
| OWASP LLM Risk | Protect AI | Cranium |
|---|---|---|
| LLM01 Prompt Injection | Partial | Partial |
| LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure | Partial | Partial |
| LLM03 Supply Chain | Covered | Covered |
| LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning | Covered | Partial |
| LLM05 Improper Output Handling | Partial | Not covered |
| LLM06 Excessive Agency | Unverified | Partial |
| LLM07 System Prompt Leakage | Partial | Not covered |
| LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | Unverified | Not covered |
| LLM09 Misinformation | Unverified | Not covered |
| LLM10 Unbounded Consumption | Unverified | Not covered |
Where they differ
Protect AI addresses LLM05 Improper Output Handling, LLM07 System Prompt Leakage — risks where Cranium scores Not covered or Unverified.
Cranium covers LLM06 Excessive Agency where Protect AI doesn't.
On the rest, they overlap. Past those gaps the decision is depth per risk, deployment, and price, not breadth.
Which should you choose?
Protect AI edges it on breadth, 2 covered risks to 1. Protect AI is built for securing the ML model supply chain, scanning third-party/Hugging Face models, and MLSecOps in the build pipeline, while Cranium suits enterprises needing to discover and inventory AI models/data/vendors (AI Bill of Materials), map exposure, and stress-test models across a large AI estate. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: Protect AI and Cranium.
Frequently asked questions
Does Protect AI or Cranium cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?
Protect AI does, 2 risks to 1 by our scoring. The diff table above shows exactly where they part ways.
Are Protect AI and Cranium independent?
Protect AI was acquired by Palo Alto Networks; Cranium is independent, as of 2026-07-13.