Robust Intelligence vs Mindgard: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?
Robust Intelligence and Mindgard are both AI Red Teaming vendors. Robust Intelligence covers 3 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and Mindgard covers 4, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, Mindgard covers more of the OWASP LLM Top 10 (4 vs 3). The full row-by-row diff is below.
Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.
Spec comparison
| Attribute | Robust Intelligence | Mindgard |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Red Teaming | AI Red Teaming |
| Deployment | SaaS + self-hosted; inline AI firewall proxy + validation pipeline | SaaS cloud platform with API and CI/CD integration; Burp Suite integration |
| Best for | Automated pre-deployment red teaming plus runtime guardrails, especially for Cisco-aligned enterprise stacks | Security teams wanting continuous automated red teaming and attack-surface mapping for LLMs, image models and agents |
| Founded | 2019 | 2022 |
| Funding | ~$44M total (seed + Series A + $30M Series B) | $11.6M+ |
| Status | Acquired · Cisco | Active |
OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: Robust Intelligence vs Mindgard
This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.
| OWASP LLM Risk | Robust Intelligence | Mindgard |
|---|---|---|
| LLM01 Prompt Injection | Covered | Covered |
| LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure | Covered | Partial |
| LLM03 Supply Chain | Partial | Partial |
| LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning | Covered | Covered |
| LLM05 Improper Output Handling | Partial | Unverified |
| LLM06 Excessive Agency | Partial | Partial |
| LLM07 System Prompt Leakage | Partial | Covered |
| LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | Unverified | Unverified |
| LLM09 Misinformation | Partial | Covered |
| LLM10 Unbounded Consumption | Unverified | Partial |
Where they differ
Robust Intelligence addresses LLM05 Improper Output Handling — risks where Mindgard scores Not covered or Unverified.
Mindgard covers LLM10 Unbounded Consumption where Robust Intelligence doesn't.
On the rest, they overlap. Past those gaps the decision is depth per risk, deployment, and price, not breadth.
Which should you choose?
Mindgard edges it on breadth, 4 covered risks to 3. Robust Intelligence is built for automated pre-deployment red teaming plus runtime guardrails, especially for Cisco-aligned enterprise stacks, while Mindgard suits security teams wanting continuous automated red teaming and attack-surface mapping for LLMs, image models and agents. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: Robust Intelligence and Mindgard.
Frequently asked questions
Does Robust Intelligence or Mindgard cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?
Mindgard does, 4 risks to 3 by our scoring. The diff table above shows exactly where they part ways.
Are Robust Intelligence and Mindgard independent?
Robust Intelligence was acquired by Cisco; Mindgard is independent, as of 2026-07-13.