TrojAI vs Mindgard: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?
TrojAI and Mindgard are both AI Red Teaming vendors. TrojAI covers 5 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and Mindgard covers 4, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, TrojAI covers more of the OWASP LLM Top 10 (5 vs 4). The full row-by-row diff is below.
Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.
Spec comparison
| Attribute | TrojAI | Mindgard |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Red Teaming | AI Red Teaming |
| Deployment | SaaS and self-hosted; runtime firewall (Defend), incl. MCP | SaaS cloud platform with API and CI/CD integration; Burp Suite integration |
| Best for | Enterprises wanting model/agent red teaming with OWASP mapping plus runtime firewall for LLM and MCP/agentic workflows | Security teams wanting continuous automated red teaming and attack-surface mapping for LLMs, image models and agents |
| Founded | Undisclosed | 2022 |
| Funding | Undisclosed | $11.6M+ |
| Status | Acquired · A10 Networks | Active |
OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: TrojAI vs Mindgard
This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.
| OWASP LLM Risk | TrojAI | Mindgard |
|---|---|---|
| LLM01 Prompt Injection | Covered | Covered |
| LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure | Covered | Partial |
| LLM03 Supply Chain | Partial | Partial |
| LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning | Partial | Covered |
| LLM05 Improper Output Handling | Partial | Unverified |
| LLM06 Excessive Agency | Covered | Partial |
| LLM07 System Prompt Leakage | Covered | Covered |
| LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | Covered | Unverified |
| LLM09 Misinformation | Partial | Covered |
| LLM10 Unbounded Consumption | Unverified | Partial |
Where they differ
TrojAI addresses LLM05 Improper Output Handling, LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses — risks where Mindgard scores Not covered or Unverified.
Mindgard covers LLM10 Unbounded Consumption where TrojAI doesn't.
On the rest, they overlap. Past those gaps the decision is depth per risk, deployment, and price, not breadth.
Which should you choose?
TrojAI edges it on breadth, 5 covered risks to 4. TrojAI is built for enterprises wanting model/agent red teaming with OWASP mapping plus runtime firewall for LLM and MCP/agentic workflows, while Mindgard suits security teams wanting continuous automated red teaming and attack-surface mapping for LLMs, image models and agents. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: TrojAI and Mindgard.
Frequently asked questions
Does TrojAI or Mindgard cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?
TrojAI does, 5 risks to 4 by our scoring. The diff table above shows exactly where they part ways.
Are TrojAI and Mindgard independent?
TrojAI was acquired by A10 Networks; Mindgard is independent, as of 2026-07-13.