Vijil vs Akto: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?
Vijil and Akto are both Agentic AI Security vendors. Vijil covers 5 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and Akto covers 3, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, Vijil covers more of the OWASP LLM Top 10 (5 vs 3). The full row-by-row diff is below.
Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.
Spec comparison
| Attribute | Vijil | Akto |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Agentic AI Security | Agentic AI Security |
| Deployment | SaaS and on-premise; agents run in confidential-computing/trusted execution environment | SaaS and self-hosted (plug-n-play), runtime monitoring |
| Best for | Teams building and operating AI agents that need context-specific red teaming plus low-latency runtime guardrails and hardened base models across the agent stack (LLM, tools, MCP, delegated agents) | Teams that already need API security and want unified discovery plus testing of AI agents, MCP servers and LLM endpoints |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Funding | $23M | $4.5M |
| Status | Active | Active |
OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: Vijil vs Akto
This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.
| OWASP LLM Risk | Vijil | Akto |
|---|---|---|
| LLM01 Prompt Injection | Covered | Covered |
| LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure | Covered | Covered |
| LLM03 Supply Chain | Partial | Partial |
| LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning | Partial | Partial |
| LLM05 Improper Output Handling | Partial | Not covered |
| LLM06 Excessive Agency | Covered | Covered |
| LLM07 System Prompt Leakage | Partial | Not covered |
| LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | Not covered | Not covered |
| LLM09 Misinformation | Covered | Partial |
| LLM10 Unbounded Consumption | Covered | Partial |
Where they differ
Vijil addresses LLM05 Improper Output Handling, LLM07 System Prompt Leakage — risks where Akto scores Not covered or Unverified.
On the rest, they overlap. Past those gaps the decision is depth per risk, deployment, and price, not breadth.
Which should you choose?
Vijil edges it on breadth, 5 covered risks to 3. Vijil is built for teams building and operating AI agents that need context-specific red teaming plus low-latency runtime guardrails and hardened base models across the agent stack (LLM, tools, MCP, delegated agents), while Akto suits teams that already need API security and want unified discovery plus testing of AI agents, MCP servers and LLM endpoints. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: Vijil and Akto.
Frequently asked questions
Does Vijil or Akto cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?
Vijil does, 5 risks to 3 by our scoring. The diff table above shows exactly where they part ways.
Are Vijil and Akto independent?
Vijil is independent; Akto is independent, as of 2026-07-13.