llmthreat
For vendors 21 vendors · 10 tools Matrix Vendors

WitnessAI vs Lasso Security: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?

WitnessAI and Lasso Security are both Guardrails / LLM Firewall vendors. WitnessAI covers 3 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and Lasso Security covers 3, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, WitnessAI and Lasso Security cover the same number of OWASP LLM Top 10 risks (3 each); the difference is in which ones. The full row-by-row diff is below.

Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.

Spec comparison

AttributeWitnessAILasso Security
CategoryGuardrails / LLM FirewallGuardrails / LLM Firewall
DeploymentSingle-tenant environment with data sovereignty (proxy/gateway model)SaaS with runtime proxy/gateway; MCP security for agents
Best forEnterprises needing an inline AI firewall to discover shadow AI/MCP servers, enforce policy, redact sensitive data, and block prompt injection/jailbreaks across employee and agent usageEnterprises wanting full-lifecycle GenAI security from shadow-AI discovery through runtime protection and red teaming
Founded20232023
FundingOver $85MUndisclosed
StatusActiveActive

OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: WitnessAI vs Lasso Security

This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.

OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) coverage diff — as of 2026-07-13
OWASP LLM RiskWitnessAILasso Security
LLM01 Prompt Injection Covered Covered
LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure Covered Covered
LLM03 Supply Chain Partial Partial
LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning Not covered Partial
LLM05 Improper Output Handling Partial Partial
LLM06 Excessive Agency Covered Covered
LLM07 System Prompt Leakage Not covered Unverified
LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses Not covered Unverified
LLM09 Misinformation Partial Unverified
LLM10 Unbounded Consumption Not covered Unverified

Where they differ

WitnessAI addresses LLM09 Misinformation — risks where Lasso Security scores Not covered or Unverified.

Lasso Security covers LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning where WitnessAI doesn't.

On the rest, they overlap. Past those gaps the decision is depth per risk, deployment, and price, not breadth.

Which should you choose?

On raw counts it's a tie at 3 covered risks each — the difference is which risks. WitnessAI is built for enterprises needing an inline AI firewall to discover shadow AI/MCP servers, enforce policy, redact sensitive data, and block prompt injection/jailbreaks across employee and agent usage, while Lasso Security suits enterprises wanting full-lifecycle GenAI security from shadow-AI discovery through runtime protection and red teaming. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: WitnessAI and Lasso Security.

Frequently asked questions

Does WitnessAI or Lasso Security cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?

Neither — both cover 3 of the ten risks by our scoring, though not the same ones. The diff table above shows where they split.

Are WitnessAI and Lasso Security independent?

WitnessAI is independent; Lasso Security is independent, as of 2026-07-13.

Last verified . Sources: https://witness.ai/, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/lasso-security-emerges-from-stealth-with-6-million-seed-funding-to-pioneer-gen-ai-and-advanced-llm-cybersecurity-301993723.html, OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025). Funding and repo figures are third-party and go stale. Re-verify before you rely on them.
Informational, not professional security advice — verify both vendors' claims against OWASP, MITRE, and the vendors directly before a decision. OWASP, MITRE, and the listed vendors and maintainers do not endorse llmthreat.com.