Credo AI vs Cranium: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?
Credo AI is AI Governance / Model Risk; Cranium sits in AI-SPM / Runtime Protection. Credo AI covers 2 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and Cranium covers 1, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, Credo AI covers more of the OWASP LLM Top 10 (2 vs 1). The full row-by-row diff is below.
Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.
Spec comparison
| Attribute | Credo AI | Cranium |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Governance / Model Risk | AI-SPM / Runtime Protection |
| Deployment | SaaS; integrates with 300+ systems (Snowflake, Databricks, AWS, Azure, ServiceNow, Jira, GitHub, MLflow) | SaaS (app.cranium.ai) |
| Best for | Enterprises and public-sector orgs needing centralized AI/agent governance, shadow-AI inventory, and audit-ready compliance mapping to EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and ISO 42001 | Enterprises needing to discover and inventory AI models/data/vendors (AI Bill of Materials), map exposure, and stress-test models across a large AI estate |
| Founded | 2020 | 2023 |
| Funding | $41.3M | $32M |
| Status | Active | Active |
OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: Credo AI vs Cranium
This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.
| OWASP LLM Risk | Credo AI | Cranium |
|---|---|---|
| LLM01 Prompt Injection | Partial | Partial |
| LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure | Partial | Partial |
| LLM03 Supply Chain | Covered | Covered |
| LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning | Not covered | Partial |
| LLM05 Improper Output Handling | Not covered | Not covered |
| LLM06 Excessive Agency | Covered | Partial |
| LLM07 System Prompt Leakage | Not covered | Not covered |
| LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | Not covered | Not covered |
| LLM09 Misinformation | Partial | Not covered |
| LLM10 Unbounded Consumption | Not covered | Not covered |
Where they differ
Credo AI addresses LLM09 Misinformation — risks where Cranium scores Not covered or Unverified.
Cranium covers LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning where Credo AI doesn't.
On the rest, they overlap. Past those gaps the decision is depth per risk, deployment, and price, not breadth.
Which should you choose?
Credo AI edges it on breadth, 2 covered risks to 1. Credo AI is built for enterprises and public-sector orgs needing centralized AI/agent governance, shadow-AI inventory, and audit-ready compliance mapping to EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and ISO 42001, while Cranium suits enterprises needing to discover and inventory AI models/data/vendors (AI Bill of Materials), map exposure, and stress-test models across a large AI estate. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: Credo AI and Cranium.
Frequently asked questions
Does Credo AI or Cranium cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?
Credo AI does, 2 risks to 1 by our scoring. The diff table above shows exactly where they part ways.
Are Credo AI and Cranium independent?
Credo AI is independent; Cranium is independent, as of 2026-07-13.