llmthreat
For vendors 21 vendors · 10 tools Matrix Vendors

Credo AI is an AI Governance / Model Risk vendor based in Palo Alto, California, USA. Its flagship product is Credo AI Governance Platform (AI Registry, Risk Intelligence, Policy Engine, agent governance). Against the OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) we score it Covered on 2 of 10 risks, Partial on 3, with 5 MITRE ATLAS techniques mapped as of . It's independent.

2/10
Risks covered
3
Partial
5
ATLAS techniques
$41.3M
Funding
Active
Status

At a glance

Category
AI Governance / Model Risk
Headquarters
Palo Alto, California, USA
Founded
2020
Employees
51-100
Flagship product
Credo AI Governance Platform (AI Registry, Risk Intelligence, Policy Engine, agent governance)
Deployment
SaaS; integrates with 300+ systems (Snowflake, Databricks, AWS, Azure, ServiceNow, Jira, GitHub, MLflow)
Best for
Enterprises and public-sector orgs needing centralized AI/agent governance, shadow-AI inventory, and audit-ready compliance mapping to EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and ISO 42001
Funding to date
$41.3M
Last round
$21M growth capital (round type reported, likely Series B extension) · 2024
Status
Active

Facts as of .

What does Credo AI do?

Governance rather than guardrails: inventories every AI system you run and maps each one to policy and regulation. It ships as SaaS; integrates with 300+ systems (Snowflake, Databricks, AWS, Azure, ServiceNow, Jira, GitHub, MLflow), and it's built for enterprises and public-sector orgs needing centralized AI/agent governance, shadow-AI inventory, and audit-ready compliance mapping to EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and ISO 42001. It's a weaker fit for teams needing runtime attack blocking or technical red teaming; Credo AI governs and maps risk rather than intercepting prompts/responses.

Which OWASP LLM Top 10 risks does Credo AI cover?

Credo AI's strongest verdict is LLM03Supply Chain. The two tables below come from our editorial read of Credo AI's public documentation as of (it's what the docs support, not a hands-on lab test), and this row also sits in the full matrix across all 21 vendors.

OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) coverage — as of 2026-07-13
OWASP LLM Risk What it is Credo AI coverage How it's addressed Source
LLM01 Prompt Injection User or hidden input overrides the model's rules or intended behavior. Partial Addressed through policy packs and framework mapping (OWASP/NIST), not runtime enforcement. https://www.credo.ai/
LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure The model leaks secrets, personal data, or proprietary content in its output. Partial Data risk classification and governance controls; no runtime DLP. https://www.credo.ai/
LLM03 Supply Chain Compromised models, datasets, plugins, or dependencies add risk before runtime. Covered AI Registry catalogs vendors/models with dependency mapping; vendor/third-party AI risk management. https://www.credo.ai/
LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning Tampered training or fine-tuning data corrupts how the model behaves. Not covered No mention of data/model poisoning detection across Credo AI's documented product surface (AI Registry, Risk Intelligence, Compliance, Runtime Governance, Agentic AI Governance). https://www.credo.ai/product
LLM05 Improper Output Handling Downstream systems trust model output without checking it, enabling injection or code execution. Not covered No output-handling/sanitization capability documented; product is governance/compliance-focused (registry, policy packs, runtime trace evaluation), not output filtering. https://www.credo.ai/product
LLM06 Excessive Agency An agent holds more permissions, tools, or autonomy than the task needs. Covered Agentic risk and control library for tool misuse, scope drift, inter-agent risk; agent sanctioning and runtime governance. https://www.credo.ai/
LLM07 System Prompt Leakage The system prompt or the secrets inside it get exposed to users. Not covered No system-prompt-leakage protection documented across product pages. https://www.credo.ai/product
LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses Flaws in RAG stores let attackers poison, extract, or infer data. Not covered No vector/embedding security capability documented. https://www.credo.ai/product
LLM09 Misinformation The model produces false or fabricated content that users act on. Partial Risk Intelligence treats reliability/misinformation as a governed risk category, without hallucination detection. https://www.credo.ai/
LLM10 Unbounded Consumption Uncontrolled requests drive cost, denial of service, or model extraction. Not covered No consumption/rate-limiting control documented; platform is governance-focused, not a runtime traffic gateway. https://www.credo.ai/product
MITRE ATLAS coverage — as of 2026-07-13
ATLAS Technique (ID) Tactic Credo AI coverage Notes Source
ML Supply Chain Compromise (AML.T0010) Resource Development Partial Vendor/model registry and dependency mapping surface supply-chain exposure at governance level. https://www.credo.ai/
LLM Plugin Compromise (AML.T0053) Execution Partial Agentic control library governs tool misuse and scope drift. https://www.credo.ai/
LLM Prompt Injection (AML.T0051) Initial Access Partial Covered via policy mapping/controls, not runtime interception. https://www.credo.ai/
LLM Data Leakage (AML.T0057) Exfiltration Partial Data governance and risk classification. https://www.credo.ai/
External Harms (AML.T0048) Impact Partial Risk assessment and policy enforcement for harmful/non-compliant use. https://www.credo.ai/

Is Credo AI independent, and how is it funded?

Credo AI is an independent company as of . It has raised $41.3M to date, most recently a $21M growth capital (round type reported, likely Series B extension) dated 2024. Lead investors: CrimsoNox Capital, Mozilla Ventures, FPV Ventures.

Credo AI alternatives

Frequently asked questions

What is Credo AI used for?

Credo AI is an AI Governance / Model Risk vendor. Its flagship product is Credo AI Governance Platform (AI Registry, Risk Intelligence, Policy Engine, agent governance). It ships as SaaS; integrates with 300+ systems (Snowflake, Databricks, AWS, Azure, ServiceNow, Jira, GitHub, MLflow), and it's built for enterprises and public-sector orgs needing centralized AI/agent governance, shadow-AI inventory, and audit-ready compliance mapping to EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and ISO 42001.

Is Credo AI independent or acquired?

Credo AI is an independent company as of 2026-07-13 and has not been acquired.

How many OWASP LLM Top 10 risks does Credo AI cover?

We score Credo AI as Covered on 2 of the ten OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) risks, with 3 more Partial, as of 2026-07-13. The table on this page breaks down every risk, including the ones marked Not covered or Unverified.

How is Credo AI deployed?

Credo AI ships as SaaS; integrates with 300+ systems (Snowflake, Databricks, AWS, Azure, ServiceNow, Jira, GitHub, MLflow).

What are the best alternatives to Credo AI?

The closest AI Governance / Model Risk alternatives llmthreat tracks are listed on the category page.

Last verified . Sources: https://www.credo.ai/, https://www.credo.ai/company, https://www.credo.ai/blog/accelerating-global-growth-and-innovation-in-ai-governance-with-21-million-in-new-capital, https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/credo-ai, https://finance.yahoo.com/news/tech-governance-startup-credo-ai-150034705.html. Funding and repo figures are third-party and go stale. Re-verify before you rely on them.
Informational, not professional security advice — verify Credo AI's claims and threat coverage against the official OWASP and MITRE sources and the vendor directly before making a purchasing or security decision. OWASP, MITRE, and the listed vendors and maintainers do not endorse llmthreat.com.