Noma Security vs Protect AI: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?
Noma Security and Protect AI are both AI-SPM / Runtime Protection vendors. Noma Security covers 5 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and Protect AI covers 2, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, Noma Security covers more of the OWASP LLM Top 10 (5 vs 2). The full row-by-row diff is below.
Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.
Spec comparison
| Attribute | Noma Security | Protect AI |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI-SPM / Runtime Protection | AI-SPM / Runtime Protection |
| Deployment | SaaS and self-hosted (enterprise); covers full AI/agent lifecycle | SaaS + self-hosted; API/gateway and CI scanning |
| Best for | Enterprises wanting one platform for AI/ML supply-chain posture, agent runtime protection and framework-mapped governance | Securing the ML model supply chain, scanning third-party/Hugging Face models, and MLSecOps in the build pipeline |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Funding | $132M | ~$108.5M (seed + Series A + $60M Series B); some trackers list up to $129M |
| Status | Active | Acquired · Palo Alto Networks |
OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: Noma Security vs Protect AI
This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.
| OWASP LLM Risk | Noma Security | Protect AI |
|---|---|---|
| LLM01 Prompt Injection | Covered | Partial |
| LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure | Covered | Partial |
| LLM03 Supply Chain | Covered | Covered |
| LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning | Covered | Covered |
| LLM05 Improper Output Handling | Unverified | Partial |
| LLM06 Excessive Agency | Covered | Unverified |
| LLM07 System Prompt Leakage | Partial | Partial |
| LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | Partial | Unverified |
| LLM09 Misinformation | Partial | Unverified |
| LLM10 Unbounded Consumption | Partial | Unverified |
Where they differ
Noma Security addresses LLM06 Excessive Agency, LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses, LLM09 Misinformation, LLM10 Unbounded Consumption — risks where Protect AI scores Not covered or Unverified.
Protect AI covers LLM05 Improper Output Handling where Noma Security doesn't.
On the rest, they overlap. Past those gaps the decision is depth per risk, deployment, and price, not breadth.
Which should you choose?
Noma Security edges it on breadth, 5 covered risks to 2. Noma Security is built for enterprises wanting one platform for AI/ML supply-chain posture, agent runtime protection and framework-mapped governance, while Protect AI suits securing the ML model supply chain, scanning third-party/Hugging Face models, and MLSecOps in the build pipeline. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: Noma Security and Protect AI.
Frequently asked questions
Does Noma Security or Protect AI cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?
Noma Security does, 5 risks to 2 by our scoring. The diff table above shows exactly where they part ways.
Are Noma Security and Protect AI independent?
Noma Security is independent; Protect AI was acquired by Palo Alto Networks, as of 2026-07-13.