Noma Security threat coverage: OWASP LLM Top 10 & MITRE ATLAS (2026)
ActiveNoma Security is an AI-SPM / Runtime Protection vendor based in Tel Aviv, Israel. Its flagship product is Noma AI Security Platform (Discovery, AI-SPM, Red Teaming, Runtime Protection, Agentic Risk Map). Against the OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) we score it Covered on 5 of 10 risks, Partial on 4, with 7 MITRE ATLAS techniques mapped as of . It's independent.
- 5/10
- Risks covered
- 4
- Partial
- 7
- ATLAS techniques
- $132M
- Funding
- Active
- Status
At a glance
- Category
- AI-SPM / Runtime Protection
- Headquarters
- Tel Aviv, Israel
- Founded
- 2023
- Employees
- 51-200
- Flagship product
- Noma AI Security Platform (Discovery, AI-SPM, Red Teaming, Runtime Protection, Agentic Risk Map)
- Deployment
- SaaS and self-hosted (enterprise); covers full AI/agent lifecycle
- Best for
- Enterprises wanting one platform for AI/ML supply-chain posture, agent runtime protection and framework-mapped governance
- Funding to date
- $132M
- Last round
- Series B ($100M) · 2025-07
- Status
- Active
Facts as of .
What does Noma Security do?
Aims to be the whole AI-security stack in one place: discovery, posture, red teaming, and runtime protection for agents. It ships as SaaS and self-hosted (enterprise); covers full AI/agent lifecycle, and it's built for enterprises wanting one platform for AI/ML supply-chain posture, agent runtime protection and framework-mapped governance. It's a weaker fit for buyers seeking a narrow standalone red-team tool or a lightweight open-source option.
Which OWASP LLM Top 10 risks does Noma Security cover?
Noma Security's strongest verdict is LLM01Prompt Injection. The two tables below come from our editorial read of Noma Security's public documentation as of — it's what the docs support, not a hands-on lab test — and this row also sits in the full matrix across all 21 vendors.
| OWASP LLM Risk | What it is | Noma Security coverage | How it's addressed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM01 Prompt Injection | User or hidden input overrides the model's rules or intended behavior. | Covered | Real-time threat protection blocks runtime prompt injection and jailbreaks. | https://noma.security/blog/owasp-top-10-agentic-risks-with-noma/ |
| LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure | The model leaks secrets, personal data, or proprietary content in its output. | Covered | Runtime data-leakage protection plus securing sensitive training data across the lifecycle. | https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/10/31/2972786/0/en/Noma-Exits-Stealth-with-32M-to-Secure-the-Entire-Data-AI-Lifecycle-from-Development-to-Production.html |
| LLM03 Supply Chain | Compromised models, datasets, plugins, or dependencies add risk before runtime. | Covered | Identifies/remediates AI supply-chain risk: vulnerable data pipelines, misconfigured MLOps, malicious models. | https://techcrunch.com/2024/10/31/noma-is-building-tools-to-spot-security-issues-with-ai-apps/ |
| LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning | Tampered training or fine-tuning data corrupts how the model behaves. | Covered | Addresses model poisoning and unscanned code/data used for training. | https://techcrunch.com/2024/10/31/noma-is-building-tools-to-spot-security-issues-with-ai-apps/ |
| LLM05 Improper Output Handling | Downstream systems trust model output without checking it, enabling injection or code execution. | Unverified | No explicit public statement on improper output handling. | None found |
| LLM06 Excessive Agency | An agent holds more permissions, tools, or autonomy than the task needs. | Covered | Agentic Risk Map and agent runtime protection constrain compromised/misconfigured agent actions and tool use. | https://noma.security/blog/owasp-top-10-agentic-risks-with-noma/ |
| LLM07 System Prompt Leakage | The system prompt or the secrets inside it get exposed to users. | Partial | Runtime threat protection covers prompt attacks; explicit system-prompt-leakage control not separately documented. | https://noma.security/blog/owasp-top-10-agentic-risks-with-noma/ |
| LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | Flaws in RAG stores let attackers poison, extract, or infer data. | Partial | ARM analyzes agent knowledge sources/embeddings for risky combinations; specific embedding-inversion control unverified. | https://noma.security/blog/owasp-top-10-agentic-risks-with-noma/ |
| LLM09 Misinformation | The model produces false or fabricated content that users act on. | Partial | Noma's agentic-risk documentation describes behavioral analytics/anomaly detection that flags deviations to help 'defend against cascading hallucinations and rogue agents' as part of runtime protection, though not framed as a dedicated hallucination-detection feature. | https://noma.security/agentic-security/series-3-addressing-agentic-risk/blog-3-2-addressing-agentic-risk-part-2/ |
| LLM10 Unbounded Consumption | Uncontrolled requests drive cost, denial of service, or model extraction. | Partial | Noma's runtime guardrails documentation discusses enforcing rate limits to resist overload attempts and blocking risky tool calls to prevent resource-exhaustion/'denial of wallet' abuse, though not detailed as a standalone product feature page. | https://noma.security/agentic-security/series-3-addressing-agentic-risk/blog-3-2-addressing-agentic-risk-part-2/ |
| ATLAS Technique (ID) | Tactic | Noma Security coverage | Notes | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM Prompt Injection (AML.T0051) | Initial Access / Execution | Covered | Runtime protection detects/blocks prompt injection; platform maps controls to MITRE ATLAS. | https://noma.security/blog/owasp-top-10-agentic-risks-with-noma/ |
| LLM Data Leakage (AML.T0057) | Exfiltration | Covered | Runtime data-leakage protection across apps and agents. | https://noma.security/blog/owasp-top-10-agentic-risks-with-noma/ |
| ML Supply Chain Compromise (AML.T0010) | Initial Access | Covered | Detects vulnerable/malicious models and misconfigured MLOps in the pipeline. | https://techcrunch.com/2024/10/31/noma-is-building-tools-to-spot-security-issues-with-ai-apps/ |
| Poison Training Data (AML.T0020) | Resource Development / Persistence | Partial | Protects sensitive/unscanned training data used for model training. | https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/10/31/2972786/0/en/Noma-Exits-Stealth-with-32M-to-Secure-the-Entire-Data-AI-Lifecycle-from-Development-to-Production.html |
| User Execution: Unsafe ML Artifacts (AML.T0011) | Execution | Partial | Scans data-science environments and models for unsafe/backdoored artifacts. | https://techcrunch.com/2024/10/31/noma-is-building-tools-to-spot-security-issues-with-ai-apps/ |
| LLM Jailbreak (AML.T0054) | Privilege Escalation / Defense Evasion | Covered | Runtime protection and automated red teaming test/block jailbreaks. | https://noma.security/blog/owasp-top-10-agentic-risks-with-noma/ |
| External Harms (AML.T0048) | Impact | Partial | ARM models cascading impact of compromised agents to prevent downstream harm. | https://noma.security/blog/owasp-top-10-agentic-risks-with-noma/ |
Is Noma Security independent, and how is it funded?
Noma Security is an independent company as of . It has raised $132M to date, most recently a Series B ($100M) dated 2025-07. Lead investors: Evolution Equity Partners, Ballistic Ventures.
Noma Security alternatives
The closest alternatives we track in AI-SPM / Runtime Protection are Apiiro, Cranium, HiddenLayer.
- Noma Security vs Straiker
- Noma Security vs Cranium
- Noma Security vs HiddenLayer
- Noma Security vs Protect AI
Frequently asked questions
What is Noma Security used for?
Noma Security is an AI-SPM / Runtime Protection vendor. Its flagship product is Noma AI Security Platform (Discovery, AI-SPM, Red Teaming, Runtime Protection, Agentic Risk Map). It ships as SaaS and self-hosted (enterprise); covers full AI/agent lifecycle, and it's built for enterprises wanting one platform for AI/ML supply-chain posture, agent runtime protection and framework-mapped governance.
Is Noma Security independent or acquired?
Noma Security is an independent company as of 2026-07-13 and has not been acquired.
How many OWASP LLM Top 10 risks does Noma Security cover?
We score Noma Security as Covered on 5 of the ten OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) risks, with 4 more Partial, as of 2026-07-13. The table on this page breaks down every risk, including the ones marked Not covered or Unverified.
How is Noma Security deployed?
Noma Security ships as SaaS and self-hosted (enterprise); covers full AI/agent lifecycle.
What are the best alternatives to Noma Security?
The closest AI-SPM / Runtime Protection alternatives llmthreat tracks are Apiiro, Cranium, HiddenLayer.