Noma Security vs Straiker: Which One Covers More of the OWASP LLM Top 10 in 2026?
Noma Security is AI-SPM / Runtime Protection; Straiker sits in Agentic AI Security. Noma Security covers 5 of 10 OWASP LLM risks and Straiker covers 5, as of 2026-07-13. Based on llmthreat's coverage scoring, Noma Security and Straiker cover the same number of OWASP LLM Top 10 risks (5 each); the difference is in which ones. The full row-by-row diff is below.
Sponsored Comparison — this slot is available to category sponsors. Paid placement does not alter the coverage data or verdict below.
Spec comparison
| Attribute | Noma Security | Straiker |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI-SPM / Runtime Protection | Agentic AI Security |
| Deployment | SaaS and self-hosted (enterprise); covers full AI/agent lifecycle | SaaS; inline runtime protection plus API/agent integration |
| Best for | Enterprises wanting one platform for AI/ML supply-chain posture, agent runtime protection and framework-mapped governance | Enterprises deploying autonomous AI agents and MCP servers that need agent discovery, adversarial testing and runtime blocking |
| Founded | 2023 | 2024 |
| Funding | $132M | $85M |
| Status | Active | Active |
OWASP LLM Top 10 coverage: Noma Security vs Straiker
This diff is llmthreat's editorial read of both vendors' public documentation as of 2026-07-13, not an audited or vendor-endorsed score.
| OWASP LLM Risk | Noma Security | Straiker |
|---|---|---|
| LLM01 Prompt Injection | Covered | Covered |
| LLM02 Sensitive Information Disclosure | Covered | Covered |
| LLM03 Supply Chain | Covered | Partial |
| LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning | Covered | Partial |
| LLM05 Improper Output Handling | Unverified | Partial |
| LLM06 Excessive Agency | Covered | Covered |
| LLM07 System Prompt Leakage | Partial | Covered |
| LLM08 Vector and Embedding Weaknesses | Partial | Partial |
| LLM09 Misinformation | Partial | Covered |
| LLM10 Unbounded Consumption | Partial | Partial |
Where they differ
Straiker covers LLM05 Improper Output Handling where Noma Security doesn't.
On the rest, they overlap. Past those gaps the decision is depth per risk, deployment, and price, not breadth.
Which should you choose?
On raw counts it's a tie at 5 covered risks each — the difference is which risks. Noma Security is built for enterprises wanting one platform for AI/ML supply-chain posture, agent runtime protection and framework-mapped governance, while Straiker suits enterprises deploying autonomous AI agents and MCP servers that need agent discovery, adversarial testing and runtime blocking. Both rows sit in the full coverage matrix — read the profiles before deciding: Noma Security and Straiker.
Frequently asked questions
Does Noma Security or Straiker cover more of the OWASP LLM Top 10?
Neither — both cover 5 of the ten risks by our scoring, though not the same ones. The diff table above shows where they split.
Are Noma Security and Straiker independent?
Noma Security is independent; Straiker is independent, as of 2026-07-13.